RICKY ADAMS GLASCO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2020-04-03
No. 18-3415
292 So. 3d 556 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2020) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RICKY ADAMS GLASCO, Appellant, Case No. 5D18-3415 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed April 3, 2020 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Kelly J. McKibben, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, Susan A. Fagan and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defenders, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues, inter alia, that the trial court erred in denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) motion to strike investigative costs, which were imposed without the introduction of any evidence. We agree and remand for the trial court to strike the $600 “Investigative Agency Costs: Brevard County Sheriff’s Office” imposed pursuant

2 to section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (2018). See Negron v. State, 266 So. 3d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (“An award of investigative costs must be supported by competent substantial evidence.” (citation omitted)). We otherwise affirm. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS. EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw