BOBBY J. NAPIER
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION AND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The conditional release statute does not violate double jeopardy, due process, or ex post facto protections, and inmates have no entitlement to credit for time spent on conditional release.
[1] The conditional release statute does not violate the double jeopardy, due process, or ex post facto clauses of the Constitution.
[2] An inmate has no entitlement to credit for time spent on conditional release.
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBobby J. Napier appealed a circuit court decision regarding his conditional release status with the Florida Parole Commission and Department of Correc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Parole Commission cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
BOBBY J. NAPIER, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellees.
No. 4D20-65
[April 1, 2020]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-CA- 010964-XXXX-MB.
Bobby J. Napier, Pahokee, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Duncan v. Moore, 754 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2000) (recognizing that the conditional release statute does not violate the double jeopardy, due process, or ex post facto clauses); Fleming v. State, 697 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (acknowledging that there is no entitlement to credit for time spent on conditional release).
LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Duncan v. Moore, 754 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2000)
- Mozell Fleming v. State, 697 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)