DEONDREA HUDSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Premeditation for murder requires only a fully formed conscious purpose to kill that may be formed in a moment and need only exist long enough for the accused to be conscious of the nature and probable result of the act.
[1] Premeditation in a murder prosecution may be formed instantaneously and need only exist for the brief moment necessary for the accused to comprehend the nature and probab…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Premeditation is a fully formed conscious purpose to kill that may be formed in a moment and need only exist for such time as will allow the accused to be conscious of the nature of the act he is about to commit and the probable result of that act.”
Court's statement of the legal standard for premeditation under Florida law, citing Asay v. State, 580 So. 2d 610, 612 (Fla. 1991)
Deondrea Hudson was convicted of murder in Leon County Circuit Court. The appeal challenges the conviction on premeditation grounds.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conscious Purpose To Kill cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-2604 _____________________________
DEONDREA HUDSON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Martin A. Fitzpatrick, Judge.
April 9, 2020
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Asay v. State, 580 So. 2d 610, 612 (Fla. 1991) (“Premeditation is a fully formed conscious purpose to kill that may be formed in a moment and need only exist for such time as will allow the accused to be conscious of the nature of the act he is about to commit and the probable result of that act.”). See also Ford v. State, 267 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019); Morales v. State, 170 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). ROBERTS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Victor Holder, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Benjamin L. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Asay v. State, 580 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 1991)
- Online Satellite Communication v. GMPCS Pers. Commc'n, Inc., 170 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
- Ford v. State, 267 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)