ELIEZER VAZQUEZ DIAZ
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A judgment revoking probation must be affirmed, but the case must be remanded for entry of an amended judgment identifying the specific probation terms violated.
[1] A judgment revoking probation must identify the specific terms of probation that were violated.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEliezer Vazquez-Diaz was convicted and sentenced to probation. The trial court revoked his probation, but the judgment did not specify which terms of …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Violation Of Probation cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ELIEZER VAZQUEZ-DIAZ,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-2722
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 20, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Wayne C. Wooten, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Craig R. Atack, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
HARRIS, J.
We affirm Eliezer Vazquez-Diaz’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand this matter with instructions for the trial court to enter an amended judgment and sentence that identifies the terms of probation Vazquez-Diaz violated. See Patt v. State, 876 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (affirming order revoking probation but remanding for entry
2 of order reflecting correct grounds for revocation); Brinson v. State, 866 So. 2d 1268, 1269 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (same).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions. EDWARDS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.