WALTER HOLLEY *P*
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's denial of the Rule 3.800 motion was affirmed, with remand only to correct a clerical error in the sentencing document.
Walter Holley filed a Rule 3.800 motion challenging his sentence in a criminal case from 2003. The trial court denied the motion.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
WALTER HOLLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-3935
[March 4, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-003715CF10A.
Walter Holley, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, but remanded for correction of a scrivener’s error regarding the sentence on Count II, which incorrectly states the year as 2003 instead of 2004.
WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.
* * *