FRANK D. SCOTT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
All issues raised in the postconviction appeal are meritless and the trial court's decision is affirmed.
[1] A court may sanction a pro se litigant for filing abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous postconviction filings by imposing sanctions including a bar on pro se fili…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFrank D. Scott, proceeding pro se, appealed a postconviction relief decision from Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 1991-CF-4660.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Gain Time Forfeiture cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
FRANK D. SCOTT,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-2703
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed February 28,2020
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Dan Traver, Judge.
Frank D. Scott, South Bay, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm as to all issues raised on appeal finding them to be meritless.
Because it appears that Appellant’s postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further similarly inappropriate pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 199 l-CF-4660, may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and
2 referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.