ANTHONY POLLOCK
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND LATISHA LAWANDA BROCKINGTON
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court cannot properly resolve factual issues or determine whether a judgment is supported by evidence without a complete record of the trial proceedings.
[1] An appellate court cannot properly resolve underlying factual issues or determine whether a judgment is supported by evidence without a complete record of the trial or ad…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the . . . judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
The court cited Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) as the basis for affirming the judgment.
Anthony Pollock appealed an administrative decision by the Department of Revenue. The appeal involved Pollock and the Department of Revenue, with Lati…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Administrative Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ANTHONY POLLOCK,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-1664
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND
LATISHA LAWANDA BROCKINGTON,
Appellees. ________________________________/
Opinion filed February 14, 2020
Administrative Appeal from the Department of Revenue.
Anthony Pollock, II, South Daytona, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni
C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General,
Tallahassee, for Appellee, Department of Revenue. No Appearance for Other Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the . . . judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”). COHEN, LAMBERT, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.