SALVATORE ROMANELLI
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Fla. 4th DCA | 2019-12-11
No. 18-3358
Bowman, J., Warner, J., Taylor, J., Conner, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A claim that fails to state a cause of action and cannot be amended to state one may be affirmed on appeal even if the trial court erred in its statute of limitations analysis.


Headnotes

[1] Under the tipsy coachman doctrine, a trial court's judgment may be affirmed on appeal on a different ground than that relied upon by the trial court, including affirmance…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Salvatore Romanelli appealed a dismissal of his claim against the Florida Department of Transportation from the Circuit Court for Broward County.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Conner

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SALVATORE ROMANELLI, Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3358

[ December 11, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John B. Bowman, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 14-19227.

Robert J. Hauser, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Marc Peoples, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Walters v. Ocean Gate Phase I Condo., 925 So. 2d 440, 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (affirming dismissal of claim under the tipsy coachman doctrine where the trial court erred in ruling that the statute of limitations had expired, but the claim failed to state a cause of action and could not be amended to state a cause of action).

WARNER, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw