PAUL G. MEAD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied the defendant's Rule 3.800(a) motion.
Paul G. Mead appealed an order denying his Rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in Martin County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
PAUL G. MEAD, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-2262
[October 10, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432006CF001665.
Paul G. Mead, Daytona Beach, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Harris v. State, 184 So. 3d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).
WARNER, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *