MALACHI SMITH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition for all writs review is properly treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and may be dismissed on its merits.
[1] A petition for all writs review is properly characterized and treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMalachi Smith, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for all writs review against the State of Florida in the First District Court of Appeal.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Original Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-4501 _____________________________
MALACHI SMITH,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for All Writs Review—Original Jurisdiction.
October 30, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The “petition for all writs review” is treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and is dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).
MAKAR, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
2
Malachi Smith, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.