MELISSA CORREA HOLLIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must enter a written order identifying the specific conditions of probation violated when revoking probation.
[1] When a trial court revokes a defendant's probation, it must enter a written order identifying the specific conditions of probation that were violated.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“If a trial court revokes a defendant's probation, the court is required to render a written order noting the specific conditions of probation that were violated.”
Court citing Musto v. State, 174 So. 3d 568, 569–70 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) to establish the requirement for written orders in probation revocation cases.
Melissa Correa Hollis entered guilty pleas in six separate cases. In two of those cases, she pled guilty to violating probation, but the trial court f…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Conditions cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
MELISSA CORREA HOLLIS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-3037
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed August 9, 2019
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Scott G. Hubbard, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Melissa Correa Hollis entered pleas in six separate cases. On appeal, Hollis argues that the court erred in accepting her pleas and entering a sentence. We find no error.
2
However, in two of the cases,1 Hollis pled guilty to violating probation, but the court failed to enter written orders identifying which conditions of probation she violated. “If a trial court revokes a defendant’s probation, the court is required to render a written order noting the specific conditions of probation that were violated.” Musto v. State, 174 So. 3d 568, 569–70 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citations omitted); see also Patt v. State, 876 So. 2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Brinson v. State, 866 So. 2d 1268, 1269 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). The record reflects that at the plea hearing, the court identified that Hollis violated condition five of her probation in both cases. Accordingly, we remand for entry of written orders reflecting those violations.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.
ORFINGER, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.