EARNEST HENRY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The conviction is affirmed, but the judgment and sentence must be corrected to reflect that the appellant was found guilty by jury verdict rather than by plea and to accurately describe the Count I conviction as fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer with lights and sirens activated, a third-degree felony.
[1] Scrivener's errors in a judgment and sentence that fail to reflect the actual jury verdict or accurately describe the conviction may be corrected on remand even when the…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEarnest Henry was convicted by jury on charges including fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer with lights and sirens activated. Th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Third Degree Felony cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
EARNEST HENRY,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-2210
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 7, 2019
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Clyde E. Wolfe, Judge.
Earnest Henry, Jasper, pro se. Oscar H. Eaton, of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm this Anders1 appeal in all respects; however, we remand for a correction of two scrivener’s errors on the judgment and sentence. On remand, the court is instructed
EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER, and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hudson v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2026)
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)