E.P., MOTHER OF S.P., A CHILD
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Parental rights may be terminated under Florida Statutes sections 39.806(1)(c) and 39.806(1)(f), but termination under section 39.806(1)(l) requires removal of the child on at least three occasions, not two.
[1] Under Florida Statutes section 39.806(1)(l), grounds for termination of parental rights based on removal of a child from parental care require removal on at least three s…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceE.P. appealed a final judgment terminating her parental rights to S.P. The trial court found grounds for termination under three separate statutory pr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Grounds For Termination Of Parental Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-435 _____________________________
E.P., Mother of S.P., a Child,
Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. David Gooding, Judge.
June 21, 2019
PER CURIAM.
E.P. appeals the final judgment that terminated her parental rights to S.P., raising five arguments, including challenges to each of the three separate grounds found to justify termination. As E.P. argues and Appellee concedes, the trial court erred in finding grounds for termination pursuant to section 39.806(1)(l), Florida Statutes, because children were only removed from E.P.’s care on two occasions, whereas the statute requires removal on at least three occasions. E.P. has not shown any further reversible error, and the trial court properly terminated her rights under sections 39.806(1)(c) and 39.806(1)(f). Therefore, we affirm the termination of E.P.’s parental rights under sections 39.806(1)(c) and 39.806(1)(f), but reverse the portion of the order finding grounds
2
for termination under section 39.806(1)(l) and remand for this ground to be stricken from the order. See A.B. ex rel. J.B. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 969 So. 2d 422, 422 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Candice K. Brower, General Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Gainesville; Robert Keep, Jr., Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Jacksonville; Crystal McBee Frusciante of Frusciante Law Firm, P.A., Sunrise, for Appellant.
Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sara Goldfarb, Appellate Counsel, Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee and Stephanie Marusak Marchman, Gray Robinson, P.A., Pro Bono Counsel, Gainesville, for Guardian ad Litem Program.