ALAIN BARUCHEL
v.
JOHN RICHARD DALTON A/K/A JOHN R. DALTON AND WENDI CASSAND
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se litigant who abuses the judicial process and harasses court staff may be barred from filing further pro se pleadings in specified cases and prohibited from communicating with court staff.
[1] A pro se litigant who abuses the judicial process and harasses court staff may be barred from filing further pro se pleadings in specified cases and prohibited from telep…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Enough is enough.”
Court's citation to Isley v. State in support of the prohibition on further pro se filings.
Petitioner Alain Baruchel filed a petition for writ of certiorari challenging a circuit court order. The court issued a Spencer show cause order direc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conservation Of Judicial Resources cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
ALAIN BARUCHEL,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D18-3881
JOHN RICHARD DALTON a/k/a JOHN R. DALTON and WENDI CASSAND,
Respondents.
__________________________________________/
Opinion filed May 10, 2019
Petition for Writ of Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Karen Adams Foxman, Judge.
Alain Baruchel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pro se.
John Richard Dalton, Daytona Beach, pro se, and Wendi Cassand, Boca Raton, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
We issued a Spencer1 show cause order directing Petitioner to demonstrate why he should not be barred from any future pro se filings in this Court and why he should not be prohibited from any telephonic and/or in-person communications with Court Staff. We conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and Court Staff and should be barred from further pro se filings.
2
Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources and protect Court Staff, we prohibit Petitioner from filing with this Court any further pro se pleadings concerning Volusia County Seventh Judicial Circuit case numbers 2017-30371-FMCI, 2017-30481- FMCI, 2018-33323-FMCI. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning these cases and not to accept any telephone or in-person communications. Any further pleadings regarding these cases will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing with The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough.").
FURTHER PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.
WALLIS, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)