ALAIN BARUCHEL
v.
JOHN RICHARD DALTON
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se litigant who abuses the judicial process and court staff may be barred from filing further pro se pleadings in the appellate court.
[1] A pro se litigant may be barred from filing further pleadings in an appellate court when the litigant abuses the judicial process and harasses court staff, and such a bar…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Enough is enough.”
The court cited this phrase from Isley v. State when imposing the bar on pro se filings.
Appellant Alain Baruchel filed a nonfinal appeal in the Fifth District Court of Appeal concerning a Volusia County case. The court issued a Spencer sh…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conservation Of Judicial Resources cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
ALAIN BARUCHEL,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-3880
JOHN RICHARD DALTON,
Appellee.
/
Opinion filed May 10, 2019
Nonfinal Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Karen Adams Foxman, Judge.
Alain Baruchel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pro se.
John Richard Dalton, Daytona Beach, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
We issued a Spencer1 show cause order directing Appellant to demonstrate why he should not be barred from any future pro se filings in this Court and why he should not be prohibited from any telephonic and/or in-person communications with Court Staff. Having carefully considered Appellant’s response, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and Court Staff and should be barred from further pro se filings. Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources and to protect Court Staff, we prohibit Appellant from filing with this Court any further pro se pleadings concerning Volusia
County Seventh Judicial Circuit case number 2018-33323-FMCI. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning this case and not to accept any telephone or in-person communications. Any further pleadings regarding this case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing with The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough.").
FURTHER PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.
WALLIS, EDWARDS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Owens v. Forte (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)
-
Owens v. Forte (Fla. 5th DCA 2020)
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)