JEFFREY C. ABRAMOWSKI
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2019-04-09
No. 18-3560
McKibben, J., Berger, J., Lambert, J., Grosshans, J.
272 So. 3d 406 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A pro se litigant who abuses the judicial process through repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings may be prohibited from filing further pro se pleadings in a particular case.


Headnotes

[1] A court may prohibit a pro se litigant from filing further pleadings in a particular case when the litigant engages in a pattern of abusive, repetitive, malicious, or fri…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Enough is enough.”

The court cited this phrase from Isley v. State when imposing the pro se filing prohibition.

Facts & Procedural History

Jeffrey C. Abramowski, proceeding pro se, filed multiple abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and senten…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

JEFFREY C. ABRAMOWSKI,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-3560

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 31, 2019

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Kelly J. McKibben, Judge.

Jeffrey C. Abramowski, Indiantown, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Due to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and sentence in Brevard County Circuit Court Case Number 05-2002-CF-063402-A, this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we

Future Pro Se Filings PROHIBITED. BERGER, LAMBERT and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

Footnotes
2 conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings. Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning the above referenced case. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. Any future filings regarding the referenced case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough."). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018); Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw