JEFFREY C. ABRAMOWSKI
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se litigant who abuses the judicial process through repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings may be prohibited from filing further pro se pleadings in a particular case.
[1] A court may prohibit a pro se litigant from filing further pleadings in a particular case when the litigant engages in a pattern of abusive, repetitive, malicious, or fri…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Enough is enough.”
The court cited this phrase from Isley v. State when imposing the pro se filing prohibition.
Jeffrey C. Abramowski, proceeding pro se, filed multiple abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and senten…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conservation Of Judicial Resources cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
JEFFREY C. ABRAMOWSKI,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-3560
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 31, 2019
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Kelly J. McKibben, Judge.
Jeffrey C. Abramowski, Indiantown, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Due to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and sentence in Brevard County Circuit Court Case Number 05-2002-CF-063402-A, this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we
Future Pro Se Filings PROHIBITED. BERGER, LAMBERT and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)