SHRONDA SUE MYERS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the revocation of probation but remanded for correction of an order that erroneously stated the appellant violated a condition for which she was found not guilty.
[1] When a trial court revokes probation, the written order of revocation must accurately reflect which violations were found proven and not include violations of which the d…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceShronda Sue Myers appealed her probation revocation on an Anders brief. The trial court revoked her probation, but the order of revocation contained a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California cases and more on FLexlaw
February 27, 2019 PER CURIAM.
In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in the order of revocation. The order of revocation erroneously states Appellant violated special condition 1 of the order of probation. Appellant was found not guilty of this allegation.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected order. ROWE, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.