GREGORY J. BATIZI
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The conviction is affirmed, but the case is remanded to correct a scrivener's error in the judgment that incorrectly stated eight years of sex offender probation instead of three years for count nine.
[1] A scrivener's error in a judgment that conflicts with the oral pronouncement of sentence may be corrected on remand, even when affirming a conviction on appeal.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGregory J. Batizi was convicted of multiple counts, including a third-degree felony (count nine). The trial court imposed a sentence of two years of p…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Third-Degree Felony Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
GREGORY J. BATIZI,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-2172
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed April 12, 2019
Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, Howard M. Maltz, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon G. Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM
We affirm this Anders1 appeal in all respects. However, we note that the judgment contains a scrivener's error where it states that Appellant's sex offender probation for count nine is for a period of eight years following the prison term. This conflicts with the
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
LAMBERT, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Piccinini v. State, 275 So. 3d 210 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)
-
Chang v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2025)
-
Clakley v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Downey v. State, 114 So. 3d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)