LAINEZ
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied defendant's motion for post-conviction relief.
Norman Lainez appealed from a circuit court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief in a criminal case from Miami-Dade County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Appellate Procedure 9.141(B)(2) cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 10, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D18-1949 Lower Tribunal No. 13-4135 ________________
Norman Lainez, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Spencer J. Multack, Judge.
Norman Lainez, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
We affirm and write only to commend the trial judge on his thorough and detailed order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief entered below.
Affirmed.