ANTONIO CONILL-VALDES
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A successive motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 may be denied, and a petition for belated appeal of such denial is subject to denial on the merits.
[1] A successive motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 may be denied, and a petition for belated appeal of such denial is subject to…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner Antonio Conill-Valdes filed a successive motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which was denied …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Successive Postconviction Motions cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ANTONIO CONILL-VALDES,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D18-2826
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. ________________________________/
Opinion filed March 29, 2019
Petition for Belated Appeal, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Antonio Conill-Valdes, Orlando, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner’s “Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Discretionary Belated Appeal” of the lower court’s June 27, 2018 order denying his successive motion for postconviction relief, filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, is denied on the merits. See Dawson v. State, 847 So. 2d 601, 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Peterson v. State, 746 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
AMENDED PETITION DENIED.
LAMBERT, EISNAUGLE, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Washington Trotter v. State, 746 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Peterson v. State, 746 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Dawson v. State, 847 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)