VAN JACKSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2019-03-06
No. 18-3473
Scherer, J., Warner, J., Forst, J., Klingensmith, J.
267 So. 3d 22 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court properly denied the defendant's Rule 3.800 motion.


Facts & Procedural History

Van Jackson filed a Rule 3.800 motion in a criminal case from 1996. The trial court denied the motion.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Klingensmith

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VAN JACKSON, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3473

[March 6, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elizabeth Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-12227CF10A.

Van Jackson, Carrabelle, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hart v. State, 246 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (en banc); Seays v. State, 253 So. 3d 21 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). We again certify conflict with Cuevas v. State, 241 So. 3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Blount v. State, 238 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Mosier v. State, 235 So. 3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Alfaro v. State, 233 So. 3d 515, 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); and Burrows v. State, 219 So. 3d 910, 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

WARNER, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw