SILVA
v.
SILVA, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court did not commit reversible error in denying the former husband's motion to vacate the child support order because there was no basis to impute income to the mother and the Department of Revenue established a substantial change in circumstances requiring an increase in child support.
[1] A substantial change in circumstances may justify an increase in child support obligations under Florida Statute section 61.14.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA former husband sought to vacate a child support order. The Department of Revenue sought to increase the father's child support obligation based on a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Imputation Of Income cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D17-2008 Lower Tribunal No. 10-20850 ________________ Alberto Silva, Appellant, vs. Mary H. Silva, et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Arthur L. Rothenberg, Senior Judge. Andrew M. Kassier, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein (Tallahassee), Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee, Department of Revenue. Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
On the record before us, we conclude that the trial court did not commit reversible error when it denied the Former Husband’s Motion to Vacate. There was no basis upon which to impute income to the mother, see § 61.30, Fla. Stat., and the Department of Revenue established a substantial change in circumstances requiring an increase in the father’s child support obligation, see § 61.14, Fla. Stat. Affirmed. 2