SEAN JENKINS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2019-01-09
No. 18-3009
Mirman, J., Warner, J., Taylor, J., Klingensmith, J.
262 So. 3d 824 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Conditional release does not impose an enhanced criminal penalty or sentence and therefore does not require actual notice of an offender's eligibility for the program.


Headnotes

[1] Conditional release does not impose an enhanced criminal penalty or sentence and therefore does not require actual notice of an offender's eligibility for the program.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Because conditional release does not impose an enhanced criminal penalty or sentence, no actual notice of an offender's eligibility for this program is required . . . .”

Court's rationale for affirming denial of rule 3.850 motion, citing Mayes v. Moore

Facts & Procedural History

Sean Jenkins appealed an order denying his rule 3.850 motion in a criminal case from Martin County Circuit Court.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Klingensmith

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SEAN JENKINS, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3009

[January 9, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 431997CF001223A.

Sean Jenkins, Orlando, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mayes v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 967, 971 (Fla. 2002) (“Because conditional release does not impose an enhanced criminal penalty or sentence, no actual notice of an offender's eligibility for this program is required . . . .”).

WARNER, TAYLOR and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw