JUSTIN A. FRANCESCHI
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-12-21
No. 18-3290
Barbour, J., Torpy, J., Evander, J., Eisnaugle, J.
259 So. 3d 322 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court must address all claims raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), and failure to do so requires remand.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court must address all claims raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), and failure to rule on any claim r…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Justin Franceschi filed a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), raising three claims. The trial …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Eisnaugle

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JUSTIN A. FRANCESCHI,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-3290

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 21, 2018

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Elaine A. Barbour, Judge.

Justin A. Franceschi, Milton, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Justin Franceschi appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Franceschi raised three claims. The trial court properly denied Franceschi’s first claim but failed to address claims two and three. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to rule on these claims.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED. TORPY, EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw