MACK REED TEDDER, II
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-11-30
No. 18-1579
Merrit, Jr., J., Orfinger, J., Evander, J., Wallis, J.
258 So. 3d 574 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A pro se litigant who abuses the judicial process by filing repetitive and frivolous pleadings may be prohibited from filing further pro se filings in a particular case.


Headnotes

[1] A court may prohibit a pro se litigant from filing further pleadings in a particular case when the litigant abuses the judicial process through repetitive and frivolous f…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Enough is enough.”

The court cited this phrase from Isley v. State when imposing the filing prohibition.

Facts & Procedural History

Mack Reed Tedder, II filed multiple pro se appeals and pleadings concerning his conviction and sentence in Hernando County Case No. 74-26-CF. The cour…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Wallis

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

MACK REED TEDDER, II,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-1579 LT No. 74-26-CF

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Daniel B. Merrit, Jr., Judge.

Mack Reed Tedder, II, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We issued a Spencer1 show cause order directing Tedder to demonstrate "why he should not be prohibited from filing any appeal, petition, pleading or motion pertaining to the conviction and sentence rendered in Hernando County Case No. 74-26-CF."

ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Footnotes
1 State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
2 Having carefully considered Tedder’s response, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings. Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, we prohibit Tedder from filing with this Court any further pro se pleadings concerning Hernando County Fifth Judicial Circuit Case No. 74-26-CF. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the judgment and sentence in this case. Any further pleadings regarding this case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing with The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough."). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2017); Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Future Pro Se Filings PROHIBITED.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw