R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
v.
GWENDOLYN ODOM, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE ETC.,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the trial court's judgment and remanded for reinstatement of the final judgment in accordance with the Florida Supreme Court's mandate.
This is a products liability case involving R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and the estate of Juanita Thurston, represented by Gwendolyn E. Odom as pers…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Products Liability cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
GWENDOLYN E. ODOM, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF JUANITA THURSTON, Appellee.
No. 4D14-3867
[November 7, 2018]
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Timothy McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502008CA038863XXXXMBAJ.
Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Val Leppert, William L. Durham II, Philip R. Green and Jeffrey L. Furr of King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, Atlanta, GA, and Charlotte, NC, for appellant.
David J. Sales of David J. Sales, P.A., Jupiter, and Rosalyn Sia Baker- Barnes, Mariano Garcia and T. Hardee Bass of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
DAMOORGIAN, J.
This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Florida following its decision in Odom v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., No. SC17-563, 2018 WL 4496563 (Fla. Sept. 20, 2018), quashing our decision in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Odom, 210 So. 3d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). In accordance with the supreme court’s mandate, we affirm and remand for reinstatement of the final judgment.
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Miami Gardens Square One, Inc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
-
V.R.J. v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2020)
Authorities Cited
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Odom, 210 So. 3d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)