JOSHUA DANIEL QUARTIER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-10-12
No. 18-0939
Weston, J., Cohen, C.J., Wallis, J., Lambert, J.
254 So. 3d 1193 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The revocation of community control and resulting sentence are affirmed, but the trial court must correct the clerical error in the revocation order to reflect the correct condition violated.


Headnotes

[1] A clerical error in a revocation of community control order that lists a condition violation not alleged in the affidavit of violation must be corrected on remand to refl…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Joshua Daniel Quartier was on community control and allegedly violated the conditions. The trial court revoked his community control following an open…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Cohen

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOSHUA DANIEL QUARTIER,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-939

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Opinion filed October 12, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Kathryn D. Weston, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking Appellant’s community control and the resulting judgment and sentence following an open plea. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a clerical error in the order to reflect that Appellant admitted to violating

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions to enter a corrected order of revocation of community control consistent with this opinion.

COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

1 The affidavit of violation alleged a Condition 15 violation. However, this too appears to be a clerical error as the factual allegations contained in this paragraph of the affidavit alleging the violation are substantively consistent with a violation of Condition 16 of community control for Appellant failing to remain at his approved residence during specified times.

Footnotes
2 Condition 16 of his community control.1 The order presently under review shows a Condition 24 violation, which was never alleged.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw