TRAVIS DEAN SESCO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Probation revocation is affirmed, but the trial court must enter a corrected order specifying that revocation was based solely on the new law offenses of driving while license suspended, battery on a law enforcement officer, and resisting officer without violence.
[1] A probation revocation order must be corrected to reflect the trial court's oral pronouncement when the written order does not accurately specify the violations upon whic…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant Sesco's probation was revoked by the trial court. The trial court's oral pronouncement indicated revocation was based on three specific new …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Law Enforcement Officer cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-0725 _____________________________
TRAVIS DEAN SESCO,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. John F. Simon, Judge.
October 18, 2018
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to enter a corrected order of revocation of probation reflecting, consistent with its oral pronouncement, that the revocation was based only on the new law offense violations of driving while license suspended, battery on a law enforcement officer, and resisting officer without violence. See Werley v. State, 208 So. 3d 832 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). Appellant need not be present. WOLF, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Castro v. State, 275 So. 3d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Werley v. State, 208 So. 3d 832 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)