ANTRAWN D. PRICE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Rule 3.800(a) motion fails when the appellant does not show that his sentence would have been different had he been sentenced under the prior version of the statute.
[1] A defendant's Rule 3.800(a) motion challenging a sentence imposed under a prior version of a statute fails when the defendant does not demonstrate that the sentence would…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAntrawn D. Price appealed an order denying his Rule 3.800(a) motion in a criminal case from Indian River County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.800(A) cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
ANTRAWN D. PRICE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D18-1317
[August 8, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 311996CF000009A.
Antrawn D. Price, Madison, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Harrison v. State, 765 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (finding that where appellant fails to show that his sentence would be different had he been sentenced under the prior version of the statute, his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 claim fails).
WARNER, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
* * *