GERNARD CHESTNUT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition for writ of habeas corpus that does not meet the requirements for authorization under Florida law must be dismissed.
[1] A petition for writ of habeas corpus that does not comply with authorization requirements under Florida law is subject to dismissal.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGernard Chestnut, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus against the State of Florida in the First District Court of Appeal.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Original Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-0971 _____________________________
GERNARD CHESTNUT,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
August 10, 2018
PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
2
Gernard Chestnut, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.