RICHARD BRIDGES
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's decision is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant filing a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith.
[1] An appellate court may affirm a trial court decision without prejudice to the appellant filing a facially sufficient motion in the future if the appellant can do so in go…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“AFFIRMED without prejudice to Appellant filing a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith.”
The court's disposition of the appeal
Richard Bridges appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Citrus County. The appellant proceeded pro se.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Facial Sufficiency cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
RICHARD BRIDGES,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-973
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 6, 2018
3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.
Richard E. Bridges, Blountstown, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED without prejudice to Appellant filing a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State, 147 So. 3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).
COHEN, C.J. and EVANDER and TORPY, JJ., concur.