BERNARD RAMKELAWAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's denial of an emergency motion to dismiss shall be treated as a denial of a rule 3.850 motion and is affirmed.
[1] An emergency motion to dismiss in a post-conviction context may be treated and reviewed as a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBernard Ramkelawan appealed the trial court's denial of his emergency motion to dismiss in two criminal cases from Broward County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.850 cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
BERNARD RAMKELAWAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D18-501
[July 5, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Lynch, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 06-22759CF10A and 07-01951CF10A.
Bernard Ramkelawan, South Bay, pro se.
No brief filed for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court’s denial of appellant’s “emergency motion to dismiss” shall be treated as a denial of a rule 3.850 motion. This appeal shall be redesignated as such and is affirmed.
GROSS, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
* * *