EDUARDO HERNANDEZ
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-06-28
No. 12-5952
Hankinson, J., Lewis, J., Osterhaus, J., Jay, J.
245 So. 3d 1025 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Double jeopardy principles prohibit separate convictions for solicitation and traveling based on the same conduct, requiring vacation of the lesser-included solicitation conviction.


Headnotes

[1] Double jeopardy principles prohibit separate convictions for solicitation and traveling based on the same conduct when the offenses arise from a single course of conduct.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Hernandez was convicted of using a computer online service to solicit a person believed to be a child to engage in unlawful sexual conduct and of trav…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Jay

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D12-5952 _____________________________

EDUARDO HERNANDEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James C. Hankinson, Judge.

June 28, 2018

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

This court previously affirmed Eduardo Hernandez’s convictions and sentences for use of a computer online service to solicit a person believed to be a child to engage in unlawful sexual conduct in violation of section 847.0135(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), and for thereafter traveling for the purpose of engaging in unlawful sexual conduct with a person believed to be a child in violation of section 847.0135(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2011). See Hernandez v. State, 135 So. 3d 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). After issuance of that opinion, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that double jeopardy principles prohibit separate convictions for solicitation and traveling based on the same conduct. State v. Shelley, 176 So. 3d 914, 919 (Fla. 2015).

2

In light of Shelley, the Florida Supreme Court quashed our opinion in Hernandez. See Hernandez v. State, No. SC14-2008 (Fla. June 8, 2016). Therefore, in accordance with the mandate from the supreme court, this cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to vacate Hernandez’s conviction and sentence for the lesser-included offense of solicitation as prohibited by section 847.0135(3)(a). REMANDED with instructions. LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Charles R. McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw