THE ESTATE OF JULES REICH, ET AL.
v.
GARY SMITH, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's non-final order was affirmed based on arbitration law principles.
[1] Arbitration agreements are enforceable according to the principles established in Cardegna v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Estate of Jules Reich and related entities appealed a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County. The case involved disputes amo…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Arbitration Agreement Enforceability cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
THE ESTATE OF JULES REICH, RHANDI KAHN, individually, RHK
JSR HOLDINGS, LLC, PALM BEACH SOMERSET, LLC, THE DUNES
AT WPB, LLLP, a Florida limited liability limited partnership, THE DUNES AT WPB GP INC., a Florida corporation, THE GRAND ISLES AT WPB, GP, INC., a Florida corporation, and MJRM BOCA LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellants,
v.
GARY SMITH, individually, Appellee.
No. 4D17-2605
[May 9, 2018]
Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey Dana Gillen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502012CA010682XXXXMB.
Aram Caldarera Bloom of Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, West Palm Beach, and Andrew M. Dector of Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants The Estate of Jules Reich, The Grand Isles at WPB, GP, Inc. and RHK JSR Holdings,
LLC.
Douglas F. Eaton of Eaton & Wolk, PL, Miami, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., 930 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 2006) (citing Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (2006)).
MAY, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (U.S. 2006)
- Reuter v. McKENZIE Check Advance OF Fla., LLC, 930 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 2006)