EDUARTEZ
v.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied the appellant's motion to vacate the surplus fund disbursement order.
[1] The legal framework established in Bank of New York Mellon v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEduardo F. Eduartez appealed a trial court order denying his May 18, 2017 motion to vacate a surplus fund disbursement order. The Florida Supreme Cour…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Vacate cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
After rendering its decision in Bank of New York Mellon v. Glenville, 252 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. 2018), the Florida Supreme Court quashed this Court’s June 13, 2018 decision in this case, and remanded the matter back to us for reconsideration upon application of Glenville. Eduartez v. Federal Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, No. SC18-1436 (Fla. S. Ct. Dec. 7, 2018). We ordered supplemental briefing from the parties. We agree with appellees Degel, LLC and Sunshores Condominium Association that Glenville requires affirmance of the trial court’s May 30, 2017 order that denied appellant Eduardo F. Eduartez’s May 18, 2017 motion to vacate the surplus fund disbursement order.
Affirmed.