ISAAC L. ANDERSON JR.
v.
STATE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-03-19
No. 17-4083
Egan, J., Palmer, J., Orfinger, J., Lambert, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A Rule 3.850 motion to correct sentence is moot when the appellant has already completed serving the sentence.


Headnotes

[1] A Rule 3.850 motion to correct sentence becomes moot when the defendant has completed serving the sentence challenged as invalid.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Anderson filed a Rule 3.850 motion challenging his sentence as invalid. He had admittedly completed serving the sentence by the time of appeal.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Lambert

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ISAAC L. ANDERSON, JR.,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-4083

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Opinion filed March 23, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Robert J. Egan, Judge.

David J. R. Frakt, of Law Office of David Frakt, Orlando, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela

J.

Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion to “correct sentence.” Appellant has admittedly completed serving what he contends is an invalid sentence, thus rendering the issue before us moot. See Sneed v. State, 749 So. 2d 545, 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (citing Palmer v. State, 182 So. 2d 625, 626 n.2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw