STATE OF FLORIDA
v.
CHESTER ROBINSON
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's order is affirmed based on the legal principles established in State v. Ratliff.
[1] A district court of appeal may certify conflict with decisions of another district court of appeal when the courts have reached different conclusions on the same legal is…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChester Robinson appealed an order from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. The specific underlying facts are not detailed in this appellate opinio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stay Of Mandate cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, LAKELAND, FLORIDA
March 7, 2018 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D17-468 CHESTER ROBINSON, DOC# 140565, ) ) Appellee. ) ) BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Upon consideration of Appellant's motion for a written opinion and for stay of mandate filed on December 7, 2017, IT IS ORDERED that Appellant's motion is granted. Issuance of our mandate is stayed until the Florida Supreme Court disposes of State v. Michel, No. SC16-2187 (Fla. Jan. 18, 2017). The decision dated December 1, 2017, is withdrawn and the attached opinion is substituted therefor. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained in this appeal.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A
TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.
MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL, CLERK
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D17-468 CHESTER ROBINSON, DOC# 140565, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 7, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, Frank Quesada, Judge. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen L. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellee
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order on review in accordance with our decision in State v. Ratliff, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D 2361 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 3, 2017). As we did in Ratliff, we certify conflict with Williams v. State, 198 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016), and Stallings v. State, 198 So. 3d 1081 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). Affirmed. KELLY, SLEET, and SALARIO, J.J., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jackson Stallings v. State, 198 So. 3d 1081 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
- Williams v. State, 198 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)