DANIEL LYTLE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 2d DCA | 2018-02-21
No. 17-3906
242 So. 3d 1056 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2018)

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DANIEL LYTLE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3906 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed February 21, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Kimberly Campbell, Judge. Daniel Lytle, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2005); Adaway v. State, 902 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 2005); Hanf v. State, 182 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Enriquez v. State, 885 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). KHOUZAM, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw