ANTHONY J. FAILS
v.
JULIE JONES, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-02-05
No. 16-4558
Johnson, J., Lewis, J., Kelsey, J., M.K. Thomas, J.
240 So. 3d 799 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A pro se litigant who repeatedly violates court orders restricting filings and engages in frivolous and excessive motion practice may be barred from all pro se filings in the appellate court.


Headnotes

[1] A court may impose a complete bar on pro se filings when a litigant repeatedly violates prior orders restricting filings, engages in frivolous and excessive motion practi…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“each frivolous, repetitive filing detracts from legitimate claims and litigants and drains a court's already scarce resources”

Court cited Pettway v. McNeil in explaining the rationale for the complete pro se bar.

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant challenged his 2004 conviction by habeas corpus petition, claiming errors in a witness affidavit and arrest warrant. Despite a 2010 order ba…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
M.K. Thomas

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-4558 _____________________________

ANTHONY J. FAILS,

Appellant,

v.

JULIE JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Appellee. ___________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Leandra G. Johnson, Judge.

February 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

By habeas corpus petition, Appellant challenged his 2004 Escambia County judgment and sentence, claiming error in the witness affidavit and arrest warrant. Appellant’s claims are meritless, and the lower court properly dismissed his habeas petition. We make no further comment on that.

We write, however, to address Appellant’s repeated violations of this Court’s orders barring him from pro se filings related to his 2004 Escambia County judgment and sentence. In 2010 this Court barred Appellant from pro se filings related to his case. Fails v. State, 46 So. 3d 1032, 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (mem.). Undeterred, Appellant filed seven more cases. In 2014 this Court again sanctioned Appellant, referred him to the Department of Corrections for discipline, and warned him further

2

violation could result in a complete pro se bar. Fails v. State, 137 So. 3d 623, 623-24 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Still undeterred, Appellant filed this meritless appeal of the lower court’s proper dismissal of his habeas corpus petition. Moreover, in this appeal, Appellant has engaged in frivolous and excessive motion practice, filing at least twenty-two different motions seeking unwarranted, unavailable, and often incomprehensible relief. This Court granted none, and hereby denies all pending motions without further order or comment.

We find Appellant’s present appeal frivolous. We direct a certified copy of this opinion be provided to the Department of Corrections to be forwarded to the appropriate institution or facility for disciplinary procedures pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes. As we have twice before, we bar Appellant from filing any more pleadings in this Court challenging his 2004 Escambia County judgment and sentence, unless represented by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar.

Further, in light of Appellant’s repeat violations of this Court’s orders, continued waste of this Court’s finite resources to timely review legitimate filings, and failure to heed this Court’s multiple warnings, we bar Appellant from all pro se filings in this Court, not just those directed at his 2004 Escambia County judgment and sentence. See Pettway v. McNeil, 987 So. 2d 20, 22- 23 (Fla. 2008) (explaining each frivolous, repetitive filing detracts from legitimate claims and litigants and drains a court’s already scarce resources). We direct the Clerk of this Court not to accept any additional filings from Appellant, unless he is represented by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar.

Accordingly, as barred and unauthorized, we DISMISS Appellant’s appeal, bar him from all pro se filings in this Court, and refer him to the Department for appropriate disciplinary action.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

3

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Anthony J. Fails, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw