EDDIEL ROSADO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's decision is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant filing a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith.
[1] An appellate court may affirm a trial court decision without prejudice to the appellant filing a facially sufficient motion in the future if the appellant can do so in go…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEddiel Rosado appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Lee County. The specific underlying facts are not detailed in this opinion.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Representation cases and more on FLexlaw
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
EDDIEL ROSADO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-529 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed January 5, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Ramiro Manalich, Judge. Eddiel Rosado, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice to Rosado filing a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State, 147 So. 3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.