DARRYL ALLMOND
v.
DALE CARSON LAW AND SAMANTHA CALDWELL

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-01-29
No. 17-2622
Soud, J., Lewis, J., Osterhaus, J., Bilbrey, J.
233 So. 3d 1290 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Summary affirmance is warranted when an appellant's initial brief fails to comply with appellate rules and demonstrates no preliminary basis for reversal.


Headnotes

[1] An initial brief that fails to comply with Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.210(b)(1)-(6) and demonstrates no preliminary basis for reversal warrants summary affirm…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Darryl Allmond appealed a summary final judgment entered in a civil action against Dale Carson Law and Samantha Caldwell in Duval County Circuit Court…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Bilbrey

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2622 _____________________________

DARRYL ALLMOND,

Appellant,

v.

DALE CARSON LAW and SAMANTHA CALDWELL,

Appellees. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Adrian Soud, Judge.

January 29, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Upon the court’s own motion, we find that the Initial Brief fails to comply with rule 9.210(b)(1)-(6), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and that Appellant’s references to ineffective assistance of counsel in the Initial Brief have no application to the summary final judgment entered in the civil action below. Because Appellant demonstrates no preliminary basis for reversal of the order appealed, summary affirmance is warranted under rule 9.315, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Cabrera v. Outdoor Empire Inc., 134 So. 3d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Spencer v. Fla. Power Light/Broadspire, 141 So. 3d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

2

Accordingly, the summary final judgment appealed is

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Darryl Allmond, pro se, Appellant.

Michael R. D'Lugo of Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw