KEREN BRISCOE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A probation revocation order must conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement and include written findings identifying the specific evidence relied upon and the reasons for revocation.
[1] A probation revocation order must include written findings that identify the specific evidence relied upon and the reasons for revoking probation, and the written order m…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceKeren Briscoe was placed on probation and subsequently had his probation revoked. The written revocation order did not conform to the oral pronounceme…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Correction Of Sentencing Error cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
KEREN BRISCOE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2024-3012
[February 6, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502017CF007110A.
Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marcus Russell Kelly II, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Keren Briscoe appeals from an order of revocation of probation and the subsequent denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing error, wherein he asserts the written revocation order does not conform to the oral pronouncement and does not contain written findings required by due process. The State filed a confession of error. We have reviewed, and we accept the State’s commendable confession of error.
Accordingly, we reverse the revocation order and remand with instructions for the original hearing judge, Judge Jeffrey Dana Gillen, to enter a corrected revocation order that (1) conforms with the trial court’s oral pronouncement, excluding the alleged financial violations, and (2) includes a written statement identifying the specific evidence relied upon and the reasons for revoking probation.
Reversed and remanded.
2
CIKLIN, GERBER and LOTT, JJ., concur.
* * *
No motion for rehearing will be accepted. The mandate shall issue immediately.