CHARLES ARTHUR JERRY, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petitioner who engages in abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and sentence may be prohibited from future pro se filings in the appellate court.
[1] A court may prohibit a pro se litigant from filing further filings when the litigant engages in abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings that abuse the judici…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Enough is enough.”
The court cited this phrase from Isley v. State when directing the Clerk not to accept pro se filings unless signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar.
Charles Arthur Jerry, Jr. filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his conviction and sentence in Case No. 05-1997-CF-5259-A in Brevard …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sanctions For Abusive Litigation cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________ Case No. 5D2025-3074 LT Case No. 05-1997-CF-5259-A _____________________________ CHARLES ARTHUR JERRY, JR., Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Charles Arthur Jerry, Jr., Daytona Beach, pro se. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. January 30, 2026
PER CURIAM.
This Court previously dismissed Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and sentence in the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Brevard County, Case No. 05-1997-CF-5259-A, this Court issued an order directing
2 Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Petitioner is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.
To conserve judicial resources, Petitioner is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning his conviction and sentence imposed in Case No. 05-1997-CF-5259- A. The Clerk of this Court is directed to not accept any filings in this case unless they are signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2025); Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
PETITIONER PROHIBITED.
JAY, C.J., and HARRIS and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)