KATHLEEN M. BONCZYK
v.
RICHARD C. WOLFE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment was affirmed because appellant demonstrated no preliminary basis for reversal.
Kathleen M. Bonczyk appealed a judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County against her in favor of Richard C. Wolfe.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Rehearing cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 14, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D25-2044 Lower Tribunal No. 22-00663-CA-01 ________________ Kathleen M. Bonczyk, Appellant, vs. Richard C. Wolfe, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge. Kathleen M. Bonczyk, in proper person. Wolfe Law Miami, P.A., and Richard C. Wolfe, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a) (“[N]o preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated.”).