MARVIN PACE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A civil restitution lien imposed under section 960.293(2)(b), Florida Statutes, must be reversed when the imposing court lacked jurisdiction under the applicable civil procedure rules and the appellant did not receive notice of the order.
[1] A civil restitution lien imposed pursuant to section 960.293(2)(b), Florida Statutes, must be vacated when the trial court lacked jurisdiction under the applicable Florid…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Florida Department of Corrections moved to impose a civil restitution lien against Marvin Pace in the amount of $273,750.00, which the trial court…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Civil Restitution Lien cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 31, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D25-0096 Lower Tribunal No. F16-7074 ________________ Marvin Pace, Appellant, vs. State of Florida, et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Anne Stuzin, Judge. Marvin Pace, in proper person. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General; Charles Thomas Martin, Jr., Assistant General Counsel (Tallahassee), for appellees. Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
In the lower court, the Florida Department of Corrections filed a motion to impose a civil restitution lien against Appellant pursuant to section
2 960.293(2)(b), Florida Statutes. On January 20, 2023, the trial court granted the motion and entered an order imposing a lien in the amount of $273,750.00. On June 27, 2023, the Appellant filed a motion to vacate the lien due to various legal infirmities including the fact that he never received a copy of the order. The trial court denied the motion and Appellant appealed. On appeal, the Florida Department of Corrections acknowledged that the motions for such liens were civil in nature. See Fla. Dep’t of Corr. v Holt, 373 So. 3d 969, 971 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023). It further acknowledged that, while the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530, it had such jurisdiction under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)(4). It also noted that the mail logs of the facility indicated the Appellant did not receive the order. The Florida Department of Corrections therefore indicated it “does not oppose Appellant’s requested relief to vacate the order in light of the review of the mail logs.” In light of the Florida Department of Corrections’ acknowledgements, the January 20, 2023 order is reversed. In doing so, we commend the candor and professionalism of Charles Thomas Martin, Jr., Esquire. Reversed.