VANESSA GARCIA AZZAM
v.
ALEJANDRO MANUEL DIAZ DE LA PORTILLA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2025-10-08
No. 2025-1428
Cuesta, J., Emas, J., Gordo, J., Lobree, J.
2025 FL 8785 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

A trial court's civil contempt order must be quashed when the alleged contemnor is not provided with proper notice specifying the time and place of the hearing and the statutory warning language, and an opportunity to be heard.

Headnotes

[1] Failure to comply with Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.615(b) requirements for civil contempt proceedings—including providing notice specifying the time and place of hear…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence
Key Quotes

“No civil contempt may be imposed without notice to the alleged contemnor and without providing the alleged contemnor with an opportunity to be heard.”

Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.615(b) requirements for civil contempt proceedings
Facts & Procedural History

Vanessa Garcia Azzam was subject to a civil contempt order issued by the trial court on June 24, 2025. Azzam petitioned for a writ of certiorari argui…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Essential Requirements Of Law Evidentiary Hearing Requirement Civil Contempt Writ Of Certiorari

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Essential Requirements Of Law cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 8, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-1428 Lower Tribunal No. 24-1692-FC-04 ________________

Vanessa Garcia Azzam, Petitioner,

vs.

Alejandro Manuel Diaz De La Portilla, Respondent.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ivonne Cuesta, Judge.

Dennis & Dennis, P.A., and J. Robert Dennis, for petitioner.

Open Book Appeals, and Erin Pogue Newell, for respondent.

Before EMAS, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

RESULT IN THE COURT ISSUING A WRIT OF BODILY ATTACHMENT

FOR YOUR ARREST. IF YOU ARE ARRESTED, YOU MAY BE HELD IN

JAIL UP TO 48 HOURS BEFORE A HEARING IS HELD.’ This notice must also state whether electronic recording or a court reporter is provided by the

1 While we recognize that a court may initiate contempt proceedings when a party fails to comply with its orders, it must do so in accordance with the governing procedural rules. See Fam. L. R. P. 12.615(b).

Petition granted; order quashed.

Footnotes
2 Vanessa Garcia Azzam (“Azzam”) petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari to quash the trial court’s June 24, 2025, civil contempt order, arguing there was insufficient procedural notice of the contempt proceedings. Based on the record before us, we grant the petition and quash the order.1 See Fam. L. R. P. 12.615(b) (“Civil contempt may be initiated by motion. The motion must recite the essential facts constituting the acts alleged to be contemptuous. No civil contempt may be imposed without notice to the alleged contemnor and without providing the alleged contemnor with an opportunity to be heard. The civil contempt motion and notice of hearing may be served in accordance with Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516 provided notice is reasonably calculated to apprise the alleged contemnor of the pendency of the proceedings. The notice must specify the time and place of the hearing and must contain the following language: ‘FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING MAY
3 court or whether a court reporter, if desired, must be provided by the party.”); Presidio Networked Sols., Inc. v. Taylor, 115 So. 3d 434, 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (noting that the trial court’s failure to provide notice and opportunity to be heard to Presidio was a “complete denial of due process” sufficient to “constitute[ ] the type of irreparable harm that is subject to certiorari review”); Dep't of Revenue v. Freeman, 762 So. 2d 580, 581 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“Denial of due process constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law.”); Hart v. Hart, 278 So. 3d 193, 193-94 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“Failure to comply with the requirements of rule 12.615(b) results in a violation of the opposing party’s due process rights.”); Leo v. Leo, 79 So. 3d 188, 189 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (holding a trial court cannot enter an order finding former wife in civil contempt without conducting an evidentiary hearing).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw