JUAN ENRIQUE JORGE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment is affirmed based on controlling precedent.
Juan Enrique Jorge appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Appellate Procedure 9.141(B)(2) cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 8, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0653 Lower Tribunal No. F06-20955 ________________
Juan Enrique Jorge, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.
Clayton R. Kaeiser, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025), cert. denied sub nom. Wainwright v. Florida, No. 24-7365, 2025 WL 1621505 (U.S. June 9, 2025); Spikes v. State, 414 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025); Arias v. State, 413 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025)
- Arias v. State, 413 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
- Spikes v. State, 414 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)