DONALD WOOD
v.
MOLLY MCINTOSH
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A landlord may terminate a rental agreement without providing a cure opportunity when a tenant intentionally destroys, damages, or misuses the landlord's or other tenants' property, as permitted by Florida Statute § 83.56(2)(a).
[1] Under Florida Statute § 83.56(2)(a), a landlord may terminate a rental agreement without providing the tenant an opportunity to cure when the tenant intentionally destroy…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Examples of noncompliance which are of a nature that the tenant should not be given an opportunity to cure include, but are not limited to, destruction, damage, or misuse of the landlord's or other tenants' property by intentional act or a subsequent or continued unreasonable disturbance. In such event, the landlord may terminate the rental agreement . . .”
Florida Statute § 83.56(2)(a), cited by the court in affirming the trial court's decision
Donald Wood appealed a county court decision in a landlord-tenant dispute against Molly McIntosh. The case involved alleged noncompliance with lease t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 8, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D24-2085 Lower Tribunal No. 23-8461-CC-26 Donald Wood, Appellant, vs. Molly McIntosh, Appellee. An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Lissette De La Rosa, Judge. Graham Legal, P.A., and H. Dillon Graham, III, for appellant. Counselaw and Angelo M. Martin; Belony Law Group and Erigene Belony, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Duffner Family 2012 Irrevocable Tr. v. Lee R. Duffner
Revocable Living Tr., 394 So. 3d 236, 239 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024) (affirming that
this Court reviews section 83.56, Florida Statutes (2024), and the interpretation of a lease under a de novo standard of review); Hirschenson v. Compu-Link Corp. of MI, 389 So. 3d 574, 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (stating
the trial court’s factual findings are reviewed for competent, substantial evidence); § 83.56(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2024), (“Examples of noncompliance which are of a nature that the tenant should not be given an opportunity to cure include, but are not limited to, destruction, damage, or misuse of the landlord's or other tenants' property by intentional act or a subsequent or continued unreasonable disturbance. In such event, the landlord may terminate the rental agreement . . . .” (emphasis added)).
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- The Duffner Fam. 2012 Irrevocable Tr. v. The Lee R. Duffner Revocable Living Tr., 394 So. 3d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)