ANNA VAL
v.
GENTERA CENTER FOR PLASTIC SURGERY, LLC, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Where an appellant fails to provide a transcript of the attorney's fees hearing, the trial court's findings regarding the fee award must be presumed correct and are reviewed for abuse of discretion.
[1] Where an appellant fails to provide a transcript of a hearing on attorney's fees under section 57.105, the trial court's findings regarding entitlement to and amount of f…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We are constrained by the record before us. [Appellant] has not provided a transcript of any of the [attorney's fees] hearings conducted in the trial court, and thus the trial court's findings must be presumed correct.”
Citation to Law Offs. of Borell, P.A. v. Acevedo, 322 So. 3d 1218, 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
Anna Val appealed a county court decision awarding attorney's fees to Gentera Center for Plastic Surgery, LLC and other appellees. Val did not provide…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appeal Of Attorney'S Fees Award cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 24, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1282 Lower Tribunal No. 20-17-SP-05 ________________
Anna Val, Appellant,
vs.
Gentera Center for Plastic Surgery, LLC, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Jeffrey Rosinek, Senior Judge.
Anna Val, in proper person.
Ainsworth + Clancy, PLLC, and Yamila Lorenzo and Ryan Clancy, for appellees.
Before MILLER, LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Law Offs. of Borell, P.A. v. Acevedo, 322 So. 3d 1218,
2 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (finding no abuse of discretion in award of attorney’s fees under section 57.105; “We are constrained by the record before us. [Appellant] has not provided a transcript of any of the [attorney’s fees] hearings conducted in the trial court, and thus the trial court’s findings must be presumed correct.” (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979))); Lanson v. Reid, 314 So. 3d 385, 388 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (stating that where appellants did not provide this court with transcript of hearing on entitlement to attorney’s fees under section 57.105, “the trial court’s findings must be presumed correct”).