PINE PLAZA HOLDINGS, LLC
v.
BENITA BENNINGER DIAZ
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court errs in awarding statutory interest under section 627.4265, Florida Statutes, and attorney's fees in a settlement enforcement action without proper evidentiary support and analysis of whether the statute's requirements are satisfied.
[1] A trial court awarding statutory interest under section 627.4265, Florida Statutes, in a settlement enforcement action must conduct an in-camera inspection of the settlem…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAfter a personal injury plaintiff accepted the defendant's settlement offer by email and signed a written settlement agreement, the defendant failed t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Enforce cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
PINE PLAZA HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant,
v.
BENITA BENNINGER DIAZ, Appellee.
No. 4D2024-3281
[August 13, 2025]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Keathan B. Frink, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE23- 006225.
Christopher W. Lee of Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, Miami, for appellant.
Lawrence M. Siff of Lawrence M. Siff, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
CONNER, J.
After the plaintiff filed her personal injury suit, she confirmed by email she would accept the defendant’s settlement offer. The defendant sent a written settlement agreement for the plaintiff to sign. The plaintiff signed the agreement and returned it to the defendant. After the plaintiff did not receive the settlement funds, the plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement and requested, in addition to the principal settlement amount, interest at the statutory rate from the date she accepted the settlement until the date her counsel received the settlement check. The plaintiff also requested attorney’s fees and costs. The trial court entered an order granting the plaintiff’s enforcement motion which included interest at the statutory rate and attorney’s fees.
Below and on appeal, the defendant argues the trial court erred in awarding statutory interest pursuant to section 627.4265, Florida Statutes (2023), because an insurance company was not a party to the settlement agreement. On appeal, the defendant renews the argument
2
that the attorney’s fees award was in error for two reasons: (1) the settlement agreement did not contain an attorney’s fees provision; and (2) insufficient evidence was submitted to support the award.
The plaintiff concedes the trial court erred in awarding interest and attorney’s fees.
We accept the concession of error and reverse the award of interest and attorney’s fees. We remand for further proceedings, including an incamera inspection of the settlement agreement to determine whether section 627.4265, Florida Statutes (2023), applies to this case, and an evidentiary hearing as to entitlement and amount of attorney’s fees to be awarded, if any.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.